News

What the government has said on remote work through the years

The federal government has transitioned from pandemic-era flexibility to a rigid in-office mandate for public servants. This article traces the timeline of policy shifts that led to the current three-day weekly requirement.

Jenny Kim
Written By Jenny Kim
Catherine Moreau
Reviewed By Catherine Moreau
What the government has said on remote work through the years
What the government has said on remote work through the years — Text

Key Takeaways

  • The federal government moved from a department-led remote work approach to a centralized mandate.
  • Former Treasury Board President Mona Fortier introduced the initial hybrid framework in late 2022.
  • Current President Anita Anand increased the in-office requirement to three days per week in 2024.
  • The government justifies these changes through a focus on consistency, collaboration, and operational needs.

The landscape of the Canadian federal public service has undergone a profound transformation since the onset of the pandemic in 2020. What began as a necessary emergency measure to ensure the safety of thousands of employees has slowly evolved into a source of significant friction between the government and its workforce. Over the last few years, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat has shifted its tone, moving away from the early days of maximum flexibility toward a more prescriptive, centralized model of office attendance.

Initially, departments were given the latitude to determine their own remote work arrangements. This decentralized approach allowed for a variety of experiences across the public service, with some employees working entirely from home while others returned to the office in limited capacities. However, by the end of 2022, the government began to signal that the era of total departmental autonomy was coming to a close.

From Flexibility to Consistency

In December 2022, then Treasury Board President Mona Fortier announced a significant pivot in the government’s strategy. She introduced a common hybrid work model that required most public servants to work from the office at least two to three days per week. At the time, Fortier was clear about the motivation behind the change, stating, “This is about consistency across the public service.”

She also remarked that “the hybrid model is here to stay,” suggesting that the government was trying to find a middle ground between the old ways of working and the new digital reality. Despite this, the move was met with immediate pushback from labour unions, who argued that the mandate was arbitrary and ignored the productivity gains achieved during the remote work period. I think this signals a broader cultural shift within the federal leadership, moving away from the crisis management of the pandemic toward a more rigid, traditional view of bureaucratic management.

Strengthening the Mandate

The transition toward more frequent office presence continued under the leadership of Anita Anand, who took over as Treasury Board President. In May 2024, the government announced an update to the “Directive on Prescribed Presence in the Workplace.” This latest iteration increased the minimum requirement for most federal employees to three days per week in the office. For executives, the expectation was set even higher at four days per week.

Anand defended the decision by emphasizing the need for effective service delivery and organizational culture. She noted that the government was making the change “to ensure that we are continuing to deliver for Canadians in the most effective way possible.” The rationale provided by the Treasury Board focused on the benefits of in-person collaboration, the mentoring of newer employees, and the necessity of maintaining a sense of fairness across different departments.

The debate over these mandates remains a central issue in Canadian labour relations. While the government maintains that a physical presence is essential for the long-term health of the public service, unions continue to call for a more flexible, results-oriented approach. As the implementation of the three-day mandate progresses, the tension between administrative consistency and employee preference will likely remain a defining feature of the federal workplace for years to come.

About the Author

Jenny Kim

Jenny Kim

National Reporter

Jenny Kim is a national reporter for Fine Times Canada based in Calgary. She covers news across the country with a focus on immigration and community stories.

View all articles by Jenny →