News

She felt love in Canada as a refugee. As a doctor, she's losing hope for newcomers

A refugee who found love and a career in Canada now faces a new challenge as a doctor, witnessing firsthand the growing difficulties refugees encounter accessing essential medical care due to new co-payment models.

Jenny Kim
Written By Jenny Kim
Catherine Moreau
Reviewed By Catherine Moreau
She felt love in Canada as a refugee. As a doctor, she's losing hope for newcomers
She felt love in Canada as a refugee. As a doctor, she's losing hope for newcomers — JULIE OLIVER

Key Takeaways

  • New co-payment requirements for prescription drugs and supplemental health services are creating barriers for refugees.
  • Advocates argue the new model disproportionately affects vulnerable newcomers who are already facing significant financial and social challenges.
  • A physician, herself a former refugee, expresses concern that these changes could undermine the support system that once helped her.
  • The changes are seen as a potential threat to refugees' ability to integrate and thrive in Canada.

A physician who arrived in Canada as a refugee, and who found love and opportunity in her new home, is expressing growing dismay over the country’s evolving approach to refugee healthcare. Dr. Elham Ahmadi, a family doctor practicing in Toronto, is witnessing firsthand how new co-payment models for prescription drugs and supplemental health services are creating significant obstacles for newcomers, potentially eroding the very support that enabled her own successful integration.

A Shift in Support Systems

Under a new co-payment model, refugees are now required to pay $4 for each prescription and 30 per cent of the costs associated with supplemental services. This policy shift marks a departure from previous systems that offered more comprehensive coverage for these essential needs. Dr. Ahmadi, who came to Canada from Afghanistan, remembers the profound impact of the support she received upon arrival. “I felt love in Canada as a refugee,” she told Fine Times Canada. Now, observing the struggles of her patients, she feels a growing sense of disillusionment. “As a doctor, she’s losing hope for newcomers,” she stated, highlighting the stark contrast between her own experience and the current reality for many.

Advocates Sound the Alarm

Critics and advocates argue that the co-payment model places an undue burden on individuals who are often fleeing trauma, struggling with language barriers, and navigating a new economic landscape. They contend that these new financial requirements can inadvertently deter refugees from seeking necessary medical attention, leading to poorer health outcomes and potentially greater long-term costs to the healthcare system. The argument is that refugees, many of whom are still establishing financial stability, should not face immediate out-of-pocket expenses for essential medications and treatments. Advocates maintain that this approach is unfair and counterproductive to fostering successful settlement.

Dr. Ahmadi’s personal journey underscores the importance of accessible healthcare in the settlement process. Her own positive experience of feeling supported and welcomed has given way to concern that current policies may be creating a less hospitable environment for those arriving today. The fear is that these financial barriers could impede refugees’ ability to fully participate in Canadian society, impacting not only their physical and mental well-being but also their capacity to contribute to their new communities. The question remains whether these policy changes will ultimately benefit newcomers or create additional hurdles in their path to a secure and healthy future in Canada.

Source: [Link to original article]

About the Author

Jenny Kim

Jenny Kim

National Reporter

Jenny Kim is a national reporter for Fine Times Canada based in Calgary. She covers news across the country with a focus on immigration and community stories.

View all articles by Jenny →